Forensics

Junk Science

Over the years, extensive scientific research has been conducted to develop accurate DNA testing. Unfortunately, this cannot be said for other forensic techniques such as bite marks and, fire analysis. False "expert" testimony using often exaggerated statistics, or conclusions put forth based on unproven science has contributed to wrongful convictions. There have also been cases of outright fraud, whether it be through expert testimony, by prosecutors, or at the laboratory.

Fixing the System: Forensic Oversight


Resources

What is Forensic Science?

Innocence Project: Wrongful Convictions Involving Unvalidated or Improper Forensic (PDF)

Innocence Project: Forensic Oversight

Virgina Law Review: Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions (PDF)

Improving the Practice and Use of Forensic Science: A Policy Review (PDF)

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (PDF)

Report: Post-conviction DNA Testing (PDF)

New York Times Article:  Plugging Holes in the Science of Forensics

The Case For Innocence -- Frontline examines why inmates remain in prison despite DNA evidence that exonerates them.

Since 1973, 278 persons have been exonerated by post-conviction DNA testing.

The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989. Exonerations have now been won in 33 states; since 2000, there have been 160 exonerations.

17 of those exonerated through DNA testing served time on death row.

The average length of time served by those exonerated by DNA testing is 12 years.

Nearly all of the 278 exonerations obtained through post-conviction DNA proceedings so far have involved similar facts and circumstances, including one or more of the following factors:

  • Fabricated or coerced confessions
  • Faulty forensic work
  • Mistaken identification (often caused by suggestive police practices)
  • False testimony from jail house informants
  • Police and prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence.

Click here to read articles detailing wrongful convictions that resulted in exoneration using DNA evidence.

DNA testing has played a major role in exonerating victims of wrongful incarceration. Many of the cases that have been corrected by DNA had other factors that contributed to the errors. Unfortunately for many, DNA is not available to correct their wrongful convictions. For others, DNA testing has been the key to proving their innocence.

DNA testing has played a major role in exonerating victims of wrongful incarceration. Many of the cases that have been corrected by DNA had other factors that contributed to the errors. Unfortunately for many, DNA is not available to correct their wrongful convictions. For others, DNA testing has been the key to proving their innocence.
an organization working to correct wrongful convictions
Injustice Anywhere
Forensics